Poland as an object of colonial policy has been much discussed in recent research on the 19th and 20th centuries. But was Poland itself a colonial power in former times? We examine this possibility using two case studies.
Text
Poland as a colonial power in Eastern Europe – this idea may seem absurd given the dominance of the history of the Second World War in Poland’s public memory. However, as early as 2004, literary scholar Maria Janion described Polish society as having a “paradoxical post-colonial mentality”, which manifests itself in being both the object and the subject of colonial constellations. She was referring to different periods of Polish history: on the one hand, the 
Kingdom of Poland
deu. Königreich Polen, pol. Królestwo Polskie, lat. Regnum Poloniae

The predecessor territories of the Kingdom of Poland were formed in the 9th and 10th centuries under the Piast dynasty. The kingdom was Christianized in the 10th and 11th centuries. In the 11th century, the monarchy was consolidated, whereby the kingdom was divided into several principalities in the 12th century, and from 1227 the seniority had only formal significance. In 1320, the principalities reunited to form the Kingdom of Poland. This kingdom entered into a personal union with Lithuania in 1386 and then merged with Lithuania in 1569 to form a real union.

In the 10th century, Poland was called Civitas Schinesghe (roughly "Gnesner Land"). Until 1025, partly in the 11th-13th century, the documents refer to the country as Ducatus Poloniae ("Duchy of Poland"). Between 1386 and 1795, the Kingdom of Poland was part of the dual monarchy of Poland-Lithuania.

 gained a dominant role over the 
Grand Duchy of Lithuania
rus. Velikoe knjažestvo Litovskoe, rus. Великое княжество Литовское, pol. Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie, bel. Vialikaie Kniastva Litoŭskaie, bel. Вялікае Княства Літоўскае, lit. Lietuvos Didžioji Kunigaikštystė, lat. Magnus Ducatus Lituania, deu. Grpßfürstentum Litauen, Ruthenien und Schemaitien, deu. Großfürstentum Litauen

The territory of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was settled by Baltic Lithuanians as early as the 11th century. These different "tribes" formed the Grand Duchy in the 13th century. The expansion of the Grand Duchy was mostly positioned to the east, as the Teutonic Order blocked the access to the Baltic Sea from the 13th century. In 1320, Grand Duke Gediminas conquered Kiev. From 1386, the Grand Duchy was under the same ruler as the Polish Kingdom (personal union) in order to be able to assert itself against the strengthening Teutonic Order in the region. In 1569, Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania also became unified states.

 in a late medieval and early modern period and thus also over Ruthenian (now Ukrainian, Belarusian, and even Russian) territories. On the other hand, 
Kingdom of Prussia
dan. Kongeriget Preussen, pol. Królestwo Prus, deu. Königreich Preußen

The Kingdom of Prussia existed from 1701 to 1918 and was reigned by the Hohenzollern dynasty. The country was an absolute monarchy from its founding until 1848 and a constitutional monarchy from 1848 until its dissolution. The capital of the Kingdom of Prussia was Berlin. The land was inhabited by about 40 million people. After the November Revolution of 1918 and the abdication of Wilhelm II, the Kingdom dissolved and formed the Free State of Prussia.

, the 
Russian Empire
rus. Росси́йская импе́рия, rus. Rossijskaja imperija, deu. Russisches Kaiserreich, deu. Russländisches Reich, deu. Russländisches Kaiserreich

The Russian Empire (also Russian Empire or Empire of Russia) was a state that existed from 1721 to 1917 in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and North America. The country was the largest contiguous empire in modern history in the mid-19th century. It was dissolved after the February Revolution in 1917. The state was regarded as autocratically ruled and was inhabited by about 181 million people.

 and the 
Habsburg Empire
deu. Habsburgerreich, deu. Habsburgermonarchie, deu. Donaumonarchie, eng. Habsburg Realm, eng. Habsburg monarchy, deu. Danubian monarchy

The Habsburg Empire refers to the territories and countries that were ruled by the rulers of the House of Habsburg or Habsburg-Lorraine in personal union from the Middle Ages to the beginning of the 20th century - but for a long time did not form a unified state in the strict sense. It was not until 1804 that the Austrian Empire was founded as such, from which Austria-Hungary and the Austro-Hungarian Dual Monarchy evolved in 1867.

The Habsburg Empire included a large number of smaller and larger lands and territories, most of which were grouped together. In addition to the Archduchy of Austria and its neighboring lands (including the duchies of Carinthia, Carniola, Salzburg and others), these included above all the so-called “Lands of the Bohemian Crown” and the “Lands of the Hungarian Crown”. As part of the expansionist policy of the 19th century, further territories and parts of the country were added, also in the Balkans (including Bosnia and Herzegovina). Due to the numerous border shifts, territorial reorganizations and temporary territorial gains and losses, the Habsburg Empire was practically constantly subject to border and territorial changes.

From the late 18th century, most of the constituent states of the Habsburg Empire formed the so-called crown lands, which later received their own provincial orders. With the transformation of the empire into a dual Austro-Hungarian state (dual monarchy), the Kingdom of Hungary and the other lands of the Hungarian crown also ceased to be crown lands. Subsequently, they were also referred to as Transleithania in official parlance, all others (excluding Bosnia and Herzegovina) as Cisleithania.

 established their imperial rule over the previously Polish-Lithuanian territories after the partitions of 
Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
lit. Abiejų Tautų Respublika, pol. Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów, deu. Polen-Litauen, deu. Erste Polnische Republik, lat. Respublica Poloniae, pol. Korona Polska i Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie, lat. Res Publica Utriusque Nationis, deu. Republik beider Völker

As early as 1386, the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania were united by a personal union. Poland-Lithuania existed as a multi-ethnic state and a great power in Eastern Europe from 1569 to 1795. In the state, also called Rzeczpospolita, the king was elected by the nobles.

 in the late 18th century. This was renewed during the Second World War by the 
German Reich
deu. Deutsches Reich

The German Empire was a state in Central Europe that existed from 1871 to 1945. The period from its founding until 1918 is called the German Empire, then followed the period of the Weimar Republic (1918/1919-1933) and the National Socialism (so-called Third Reich) from 1933 to 1945. 01.01.1871 is considered the day of the foundation of the German Reich.

 and 
Soviet Union
deu. Union der Sozialistischen Sowjetrepubliken, deu. Sowjetunion, rus. Sovetskiy Soyuz, rus. Советский Союз, . Совет Ушем, . Советонь Соткс, rus. Sovetskij Soûz, . Советий Союз, yid. ראַטן־פֿאַרבאַנד, yid. סאוועטן פארבאנד, yid. sovətn farband, yid. sovʿtn-farband, yid. sovətn-farband, . Советтер Союзу, . Совет Союзы, deu. Советий Союз, . Советон Цæдис, . Совет Эвилели

The Soviet Union (SU or USSR) was a state in Eastern Europe, Central and Northern Asia that existed from 1922 to 1991. It emerged from the so-called Soviet Russia, the successor state of the Russian Empire. The Russian Soviet Republic formed the core of the union and at the same time its largest part, with further constituent republics added. Their number varied over time and was related to the occupation of other countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), Soviet republics that existed only for a short time (Karelo-Finlandia) or the division or merger of Soviet republics. In addition, there were numerous autonomous republics or other territorial units with an autonomy status that was essentially limited to linguistic autonomy for minorities.

Before its formal dissolution, the USSR consisted of 15 Soviet republics with a population of approximately 290 million people. At around 22.4 million km², it was the largest territorial state in the world at the time. The Soviet Union was a socialist soviet republic with a one-party system and an absence of separation of powers.

 occupations and, in the Soviet case, continued until 1989. In this essay, we focus on the phase of Polish dominance in the pre-modern period and use two case studies to discuss the question of whether it can be accurately described using concepts from postcolonial theory.
Terms and categories of postcolonial theory
Text
One aspect of colonialism that is generally associated with the maritime empires of Western Europe from the 16th century onwards is the attribution of “colonial difference”. This means that a distinction is made between supposedly progressive and regressive societies, whereby a civilizing mission is attributed to the former. According to Homi K. Bhabha, however, there is an ambivalence here: ‘civilization’ in the sense of complete assimilation and alignment with the status of the colonizers is neither possible nor desirable, as this difference ultimately secures the colonial powerrelations.1 In extreme cases, the indigenous population was denied any claim to the land to be colonized and the area – for example in the case of North America or Southwest Africa – was described as deserted, chaotic and dangerous.2
 
Scholars who attempt to methodically address this colonial difference often cite Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak’s provocative question: “Can the Subaltern Speak?”3 In view of the colonial, power-based production of writing, she argues that we should also identify and trace the oral traditions of the colonized. Spivak has thus attributed to the colonized people the ability to act on their own authority – agency in postcolonial theory – and thus identified them as active subjects. For her, the subalterns are not simply colonized people who are completely or partially excluded from participation in social life, but a social construction that is designed to enforce their object status.
With regard to the Ruthenian, Lithuanian and also the Jewish populations in the context of Polish rule during the pre-modern era, the question now arises as to whether they were regarded by the Polish elite as less civilized due to certain cultural characteristics and thus became the object of colonialism.
The Polish conquest of the Halych Rus’
Text
“With God’s help, but not without great losses”, Casimir III had succeeded in conquering the principality of the infidel Ruthenians. Seven bishoprics and an archbishopric could now be founded, but this would be jeopardized by invasions of the Tartars and Lithuanians. This is how the Polish conquest of the former Principality of Halych-Volhynia was described in a letter to the papal curia in the spring of 1351.4 The prospect of missionary development was intended to win financial support for Casimir’s campaigns. While Polish historiography in the tradition of Romanticism stylized this expansion as a ‘defining moment’ for the nation, the emerging Ukrainian historiography around 1900 saw it as a colonial suppression of Ruthenian (meaning Ukrainian) statehood.5 More recent research has relativized this contrast. On closer inspection, there can be no question of colonial superiority. Especially in the first decades after the conquest, the scope of action of the Polish Kingdom was very limited. Rather, Casimir III and his successors were dependent on cooperation with regional elites. Their most important representatives, such as Dmytro of Goraj, succeeded in rising to the highest offices in the kingdom. In the first decades of the 15th century, it was Ruthenian nobles who fought for legal equality with their Polish peers. This demand was finally realized in the transfer of Polish law in 1430/1434.
Nevertheless, the 15th century saw an accumulation of power by Polish magnate families. However, the lines of conflict were by no means between the ‘colonizers’ and the ‘colonized’. When Ruthenian nobles defended themselves against the dominance of the Polish Odrowąż family in the so-called Confederation of Lviv, they found an important ally in the Polish crown, which was also interested in limiting the power of this family.
Similar situational constellations can be observed between the various legal-religious communities in the cities. In Lviv, the Polish-German Latin nation under Saxon-Magdeburg law gained a dominant position during the 15th century.6 However, when it sought royal arbitration against Jewish cloth merchants in the context of intensifying economic competition in 1489, the court ruled in favor of the latter.7 
The Polish conquest of the former Ruthenian principality can therefore not be understood as colonial expansion. The scope of Polish royal rule was too limited for this and the legal spaces in the conquered territories were too diverse. In order to adequately describe the actions of the key players, it must also be taken into account that conflict constellations between individual groups could be very changeable. Although different ethnic-religious groups were involved, the specific conflicts were predominantly politically and socially motivated.
The Polish-Lithuanian Union
Text
The Union of Lublin, established in 1569, followed on from the dynastic marriage union between the Crown of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the  Agreement of Krewo/Kreva
Agreement of Krewo
also:
Agreement of Kreva
Agreement between the Grand Duke of Lithuania, Jogaila, and the Polish Greats. In it, Jogaila promised that if he was crowned Polish king and married the Polish queen Jadwiga, he would profess the Latin Christian faith and unite his Lithuanian lands with the Polish crown. A few months later in Vaŭkaýsk, the consent of the Lesser Polish Greats was given. Both documents marked the beginning of the development towards Polish-Lithuanian union.
 of 1385 and other Polish-Lithuanian treaties. As in the late 14th century, the ruling dynasty of the Crown of Poland lacked a male successor; however, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, whose position as a great power was threatened by the expansion of the Tsardom of Russia (Muscovy), was under greater pressure.8 In the medium term, the Union of Lublin transformed the personal union established in 1385 into a real union, i.e. a federation of two states with a common king, parliament (Sejm), and foreign policy. Here, the union will be examined as a case study in order to test the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth for colonial characteristics.
In 1564, Sigismund II Augustus, the last Jagiellonian king, advocated the “union of two nations into a unified and inseparable entity” in 15649 and used the metaphor of a single, indivisible body. However, he granted the Polish and Lithuanian nations “their own customs, judicial rights and privileges”.10 The compromise document of July 1569, which was the result of laborious negotiations, drafts and counter-drafts, also defined the new federal state as an “indivisible body”; however, the term “double nation” and the guarantee of old Lithuanian offices, rights and freedoms contradicted this.11 With regard to the title of the future common king, the agreement consisted in the order of “King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania, 
Ruthenia

Ruthenia is the Latinized German term for the Rus', i.e. roughly all areas of Eastern Europe that once belonged to the territory of Kyiv Rus' and/or had a Rus' (East Slavic and Orthodox) majority. Due to the expansions of the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the 14th century, many of these areas came under Polish and Lithuanian rule. “Ruthenia” or ‘the Ruthenian lands’ is therefore also a term used to distinguish these areas from those under Muscovite rule.

Prussia
deu. Preußen

The historical region is named after the Baltic tribe of the Prussians. In the course of the establishment of the Teutonic Order, this tribe was subjugated, but the name of the region was retained. The Prussian Confederation, founded in 1440 and consisting of both nobles and towns, broke away from the Teutonic Order and submitted to the Polish king. The territory of the Confederation has since been known as Royal Prussia. The remaining part of the former territory of the Teutonic Order was finally transferred to the Duchy of Prussia in 1525, from which the later Kingdom of Prussia emerged.

Mazovia
deu. Masowien, pol. Mazowsze

The historical landscape of Mazovia lies around Warsaw on the Vistula and Bug rivers. Initially part of Piast Poland in the Middle Ages, from the 12th century it was a duchy temporarily connected to Poland only as a fiefdom. In the 16th century Mazovia was reincorporated into the kingdom and divided into three voivodeships. There is also a voivodeship of Mazovia in today's Poland.

Samogitia
deu. Samogitien, yid. Zámet, lit. Žemaitija, deu. Schamaiten, deu. Niederlitauen

Samogitia is a historical region in what is now western Lithuania. Originally settled by Baltic tribes, the region has been the scene of conflict between the Teutonic Order and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania since the 13th century. Following the Order's military defeats at the beginning of the 15th century, it ceded the region to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. It remained as such until the partitions of Poland-Lithuania at the end of the 18th century.

Kyjiw
deu. Kiew, eng. Kiev, eng. Kyiv, pol. Kijów

Kiev is located on the Dnieper River and has been the capital of Ukraine since 1991. According to the oldest Russian chronicle, the Nestor Chronicle, Kiev was first mentioned in 862. It was the main settlement of Kievan Rus' until 1362, when it fell to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, becoming part of the Polish-Lithuanian noble republic in 1569. In 1667, after the uprising under Cossack leader Bogdan Chmel'nyc'kyj and the ensuing Polish-Russian War, Kiev became part of Russia. In 1917 Kiev became the capital of the Ukrainian People's Republic, in 1918 of the Ukrainian National Republic, and in 1934 of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Kiev was also called the "Mother of all Russian Cities", "Jerusalem of the East", "Capital of the Golden Domes" and "Heart of Ukraine".
Kiev is heavily contested in the Russian-Ukrainian war.

Due to the war in Ukraine, it is possible that this information is no longer up to date.

Volhynia
deu. Wolhynien, pol. Wolyń, ukr. Воли́нь, ukr. Wolyn, deu. Wolynien, lit. Voluinė, rus. Волы́нь, rus. Wolyn

The historical landscape of Volhynia is located in northwestern Ukraine on the border with Poland and Belarus. Already in the late Middle Ages the region fell to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and from 1569 on belonged to the united Polish-Lithuanian noble republic for more than two centuries. After the partitions of Poland-Lithuania at the end of the 18th century, the region came under the Russian Empire and became the name of the Volhynia Governorate, which lasted until the early 20th century. The Russian period also saw the immigration of German-speaking population (the so-called Volhyniendeutsche), which peaked in the second half of the 19th century. After the First World War Volhynia was divided between Poland and the Ukrainian Soviet Republic, from 1939, as a result of the Hitler-Stalin Pact, completely Soviet and already in 1941 occupied by the Wehrmacht. Under German occupation there was systematic persecution and murder of the Jewish population as well as other parts of the population.
After World War II, Volhynia again belonged to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic and since 1992 to Ukraine. The landscape gives its name to the present-day Ukrainian oblast with its capital Luzk (ukr. Луцьк), which is not exactly congruent.

Podlachia
deu. Podlachien, lat. Podlachia, ukr. Підлісся, ukr. Pidlissja, bel. Падляшша, bel. Padljašša, lit. Palenkė, pol. Podlasie, deu. Podlasien

Podlaskie is located in the east of Poland and is bordered by the rivers Bug and Memel. The territory was incorporated by conquest first into the Polish Kingdom in 1569 and later into the Polish-Lithuanian Union.

 and 
Livonia
deu. Livland, est. Liivimaa, lav. Livonija, dan. Lyffland, swe. Livland, eng. Livland, deu. Vidzeme, lat. Livonia, rus. Lifliandiia, rus. Lifljandija, rus. Liflândiâ, rus. Лифляндия, rus. Livonija, rus. Livoniâ, rus. Ливония, rus. Vidzeme, rus. Видземе, pol. Liwlandia, lat. Terra Mariana, rus. Livoniia, rus. Livonya, rus. Liwonija, deu. Eifland, deu. Liefland, dan. Livland

Livonia (Livonija in Latvian, Liivimaa in Estonian) is a historical landscape in the Baltic States. It comprises the southern part of present-day Estonia and the part of present-day Latvia north of the Daugava River. The landscape was named after the Livonians, a population group that hardly exists today.

Historically, the name Livonia can refer to other, different contexts. The governorate of the same name, which was one of the three Baltic Sea governorates of the Russian Empire, is particularly influential for today's understanding of the historical region. It existed from the beginning of the 18th century until 1918 and its capital was Riga, located at the mouth of the Duna.

Livonia had previously given its name to other states and confederations, most notably the Livonian Confederation, which had existed since the High Middle Ages. The Livonian part of the Teutonic Order as well as regional ecclesiastical states belonged to the confederation. The confederation also included large parts of the present-day states of Latvia and Estonia. After the dissolution of the confederation and the Teutonic Order state in the 16th century, sovereignty changed several times. Without the southern and northern areas, Livonia initially came under Polish-Lithuanian rule, later also under Swedish suzerainty, before coming under Russian rule in the course of the Great Northern War (1700-1721). Until the beginning of the 20th century, the central role of the landowning German-speaking nobility was particularly influential in the internal social organization of the rural area.

”. The fact that the Polish Diet in 
Lublin
deu. Lublin, yid. lublyn, yid. לובלין, lat. Lublinum, pol. Lubelin, lat. Lyvblin, pol. Lubelnia, lat. lvblyn, rus. Люблин, rus. Lyublin, rus. Ljublin, rus. Lûblin, rus. Lûblin"

Lublin (population 2023: 329,565) is the capital of the same-named voivodeship in eastern Poland. The city is one of the most important political centers and industrial sites in eastern Poland as well as one of the most important educational centers in the country. In addition to the state Maria Curie Skłodowska University, Lublin is also home to the renowned Catholic University of Lublin John Paul II. In 1569, the real union of the dual monarchy of Poland and Lithuania was established in the Union of Lublin. Lublin was briefly the capital of Poland in 1809, 1918 and 1944/45. In the 17th and 18th centuries, the city was a stronghold of Protestantism in Poland. In the 16th and 17th centuries, Lublin was the heart of Judaism in the country, and from the end of the 18th century it was the most important place for Hasidism. In 1930, the largest Talmud school in the world at the time was opened in Lublin, but had to close after the German invasion of Poland in 1939. Between 1939 and 1942, most of the city's Jewish population, initially imprisoned in the ghetto and later deported to concentration camps, including in the Lublin concentration camp in the Majdanek district, were murdered. After the Second World War, Lublin was an important location for the automotive industry. In 1980, the city was one of the most important centers of resistance against the Communist rulers.

 incorporated the Lithuanian voivodeships of Podlasie, Volhynia and Kyiv into the crown in the absence of the Lithuanian deputies12 points to the inferiority of the Grand Duchy, but also to its perception as a separate state.
But can the Polish-Lithuanian relationship in 1569 be understood as colonial due to the power imbalance described above? There are several arguments against this: Firstly, there are no references to ‘colonial difference’ in the sources. The people involved in negotiating the union were all nobles on both sides, whose close cultural ties were expressed in marriage relationships, among other things. The Lithuanian nobles – including those in the Ruthenian voivodeships incorporated into the crown – retained their land and were therefore not regarded as subalterns, but as actors on an equal footing with the Poles. The Lublin Act of Union was aimed at a constitutional settlement between two at least historically equal systems of rule, not at colonial exploitation of the Lithuanians. Although the Grand Duchy of Lithuania subsequently lost influence within the Union, this was due to the growing threat from Muscovy.
And how should the status of the “Ruthenian nation” be characterized? In the Act of Union of 1569, it stands alongside the nations of Lithuania, Samogitia, and others.13 The ambiguous understanding of “nation” (naród) is revealing: In early modern Polish, the term could mean, among other things, a regional or linguistic community, but also a political nation, that is, the politically relevant nobility.14 The common Latin phrase “gente Ruthenus, natione Polonus”, which distinguished regional, linguistic and religious affiliation from political affiliation, was clearer. The Act of Union of 1569 subsumed the Ruthenian nobles politically under the “Lithuanians”, because the expansion of the Grand Duchy into East Slavic territories in the 14th century had started from the seat of power in Vilnius. They were thus part of the political union. Given the partial invisibility of the Ruthenians in the discourse of the “Republic of the Two Nations”, can we still speak of “colonial difference”? At the linguistic level, Ruthenian remained recognized as the language of the chancellery in the Grand Duchy until the 17th century, despite the increasing Polonization. At the legal level, the first  codification
Codification
Written record of the legal norms in force in a particular territory in the form of a systematic order.
 of “Lithuanian” customary law took place in the form of three legal codes of the Statutes of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (1529, 1566 and 1588), which were written in Ruthenian and preceded the Polish codification process.15 The Ruthenians were therefore not perceived as less civilized. With regard to religious difference, the answer is more difficult. In the Union of Brest of 1596, the church union between the Ruthenian Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church in Poland-Lithuania, the majority of Orthodox bishops accepted the authority of the Pope on the condition that they were allowed to continue the Byzantine tradition in the rite. However, the subsequent papal bull reinterpreted the act as a “return” of the erring Ruthenians to the true Church. From the point of view of the united clergy, the character of the union was thus torpedoed.16 This religious appropriation was not colonial, however, because it attempted to level out the ritual difference, i.e. it sought to achieve an alignment and not a “colonial difference” between Poles and Ruthenians.
Overview and conclusion
Text
In 1893, the Polish poet Seweryna Duchińska published her album of Polish queens and kings. She paid tribute to Casimir III as follows: “And you protected Poland with brick walls to stop the outbreaks of the Tatar savages.”17 
Text
The portrait of the ruler by Walery Eljasz-Radzikowski printed on the opposite page underlines this notion of Casimir as a bringer of civilization. However, there is not a word in the poem about the conquest of the former Ruthenian principality. Instead, the whole of Poland is surrounded by a wall. Duchińska also published various collections of Polish folk songs, in which she included Lithuanian and Ruthenian songs. This nationalist appropriation of Lithuania and Ukraine is typical of Polish discourse around 1900,18 which was accompanied by the construction of a “colonial difference”. From the perspective of the linguist and cultural scientist Aleksander Brückner, for example, it was only the Polish conquest of the East that brought “new light” to the culturally inferior Ruthenians and Ukrainians.19
 
The medieval and early modern history of Poland-Lithuania was often characterized by violent conquests and power struggles between the crown, the nobility and the various legal-religious communities. However, it was only the authors of the 19th century who reshaped this history in nationalist and colonialist terms.20 This is all the more remarkable given that Poland itself was the object of imperial rule at the time. The thought patterns of the turn of the century continued into the interwar period, when the Polish Republic itself was striving to become a colonial power.21 In addition, Polish activists tried to attribute a civilizing mission to Poland vis-à-vis the Ukrainians.22 To some extent, these attitudes still shape research today. For example, the practice of often reproducing East Slavic names and places solely in polonized form testifies to the still tangible tendency to mentally assimilate eastern Poland-Lithuania (Kresy) as Polish.
Text
English translation: William Connor

Siehe auch